Thursday, February 2, 2012

Dragons & Elephants May Solve Australia's Environmental Problems, Scientist Says (LiveScience.com)

Between out-of-control fires and destructive invasive species, Australia is facing major environmental problems. Now, an Australian scientist says he has a radical solution to these issues: Import large animals, such as elephants, to consume flammable grasses and combat the feral animals that are reconstructing the ecosystem.

"A lot of people are saying that we need to look to geoengineering?to solve our problems," said David Bowman, a professor of environmental change biology at the University of Tasmania, Australia. "What I am saying is that we need a new nature ??we need to try ecosystem engineering."

On Feb. 7, 2009, an unusually massive firestorm ravaged around 990,000 acres (400,000 hectares) in southern Australia. The incident, known as Black Saturday, was indeed a unique case, but fires are a constant problem for the continent because of flammable grasses, most notably the African gamba grass, which is considered an alien species.

In addition to the exotic grasses, numerous non-native animal species?? pigs, goats, cattle, horses, donkeys, camels, buffalo and deer ? are competing against native species for resources, destroying habitats and spreading diseases to domestic animals, Bowman said.

Current methods to tackle these problems just aren?t working, Bowman told LiveScience. For example, management officials have tried tracking radio-collared buffalo from helicopters to find and kill other herd members. But, Bowman says, for every buffalo that?s killed, another is born to take its place.

So he decided to think outside the box.

"What I was trying to do is crystallize all of the issues in a single piece," Bowman said of his ideas, published as a commentary in the Feb. 2 issue of the journal Nature. "How far are humans going to go in managing landscapes? What is acceptable and what is not?"

A radical solution

Australia could start to reintroduce top predators into the ecosystem, Bowman said. Farmers and management agencies currently poison the Australian wolf (dingo), one of the continent's key predators, to protect livestock.

"But when you reduce a dingo population, it changes their predatory behavior," Bowman said. "When they are allowed to build up packs, they control cats and foxes." By poisoning the dingoes, they're decreasing their numbers and pack size, making the predators less-efficient hunters; without controls on the fox and cat populations, these feral animals are currently killing native birds, mammals, reptiles and insects in large numbers.

More dingoes could also help control other feral animals, such as pigs, he said.

In addition to dingoes, Bowman suggests introducing other large predators to the land, such as the Komodo dragon, to take the place of the giant lizards that once roamed Australia. Tim Flannery, a biologist at Macquarie University in Australia, originally came up with this idea, Bowman explained.

"But it's very controversial," he said. "I think it's actually better to use human hunters than introducing top predators."

Recent government programs have started to allow Australia?s indigenous people?to return to their tribal lands, from which they were evicted by British colonizers starting in the late 1700s, Bowman said. The programs provide social and health benefits to the Aboriginal hunters, and employing more of the hunters could help control feral animals and reinstate patch burning, which prevents large fires from springing up, he said.

To further reduce fires, Bowman suggests enlisting the help of large African herbivores, such as elephants and rhinoceroses. Australia's current herbivores ? both native and alien ? are unable to graze on the tall gamba grass, but this is likely not true for elephants and rhinoceroses, which deal with the grass in their homeland. [Elephant Gallery: Biggest Beasts on Land]

Officials would need to introduce these animals in small areas and use various techniques, including contraceptives and tracking technologies, to manage and monitor their habits, Bowman said.

"The elephant idea is a bit crazy," he conceded. "But when you have a grass that is so disruptive, it's certainly reasonable to think of serious management options."

Risks abound

Not everyone is sold on Bowman's radical plan to introduce the giant herbivores and predators. "It seems like a terrific idea and one that will get a lot of people excited," said Mark Hoddle, a biologist at the University of California, Riverside. "But once they start thinking about it, they?ll see that it?s a flawed idea."

There are a lot of things to consider when introducing a new species to an area, said Hoddle, who specializes in controlling pests with other non-native species. For example, elephants and rhinos won?t be restricted to eating just the flammable grasses; they?ll likely munch on native species, too. Additionally, they could have a negative impact on the local soil, or be reservoirs for diseases that don't currently have a foothold in Australia. "They'll most likely cause more harm than the intended benefits," Hoddle told LiveScience. [Devastating Infectious Diseases]

Hoddle is also concerned with the large amount of dung?the animals will produce. "Australia already has huge problems with flies from droppings of non-native mammals," he said.

Steven Hess, a research biologist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Hawaii, says that introducing Komodo dragons wouldn't be a good idea either. "Once you start adding more and more animals to the system, you are basically committed to ecosystem change," Hess told LiveScience. "You are ruling out the option of ever going back."

And, if you do want to replace one extinct species with one that's currently living, they have to be ecological equivalents, he said. ?You would have to study that carefully to find out what these extinct species were doing before you release another species into the mix,? he said. ?I think that?s why this re-wilding idea hasn?t caught on like wildfire.?

For his part, Bowman wouldn't be entirely disappointed if the scientific community shoots down his ideas, but he does hope that others will come up with better ideas to manage Australia's pressing problems.

"I'm not really an advocate for any of these ideas," he said. "I'm an advocate for the land."

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/environment/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20120201/sc_livescience/dragonselephantsmaysolveaustraliasenvironmentalproblemsscientistsays

china aircraft carrier barbara walters most fascinating person 2011 golden globe nominations los angeles clippers los angeles clippers charlize theron telenav

Spider's detachable penis finishes without him

Sex can be dangerous, even deadly if your partner has plans to eat you. When the male orb-web spider has its first, and sometimes last, sexual encounter it has a trick up its sleeve: detachable genitalia which keep pumping even after their owner's moved on.

The orb-web spider Nephilengys malabarensis is sexually cannibalistic and the male has detachable genitals. These spiders have at most two chances to mate: They have a pair of sperm-transferring organs, actually called their "palps" but analogous to a penis, which detach from their bodies when they disengage from mating ? either when the female pushes them away and possibly eats them or they successfully run away to risk death another day.

For spiders this breakage of male?s sperm-transferring organ is common, says researcher Daiquin Li, of the University of Singapore, but it's usually just the tip.

  1. More science news from msnbc.com

    1. Ocean motion could?provide 9 percent of U.S. electricity

      Next-generation technologies that harvest electricity from ocean waves and tides sloshing along the U.S. coasts could provide about 9 percent of the nation's demand by 2030, according to a pair of recent studies.

    2. Pythons pose rising threat in Everglades
    3. Volcanoes may have sparked Little Ice Age
    4. From mouse to elephant in 24 million generations

"However, some spider species exhibit extreme genital mutilation or the 'eunuch phenomenon,' where males castrate their entire pedipalp(s) during copulation," Li, author of a new study on this process, told LiveScience.

Extreme sacrifice
This eunuch behavior is a pretty confusing concept to most researchers: They (like most men reading this) really couldn't think of a way that having a break-off penis could be a good thing. They previously thought that this full breakage was just a mistake (since what good, evolutionarily speaking, is a male unable to have sex?), but Li believes it must have some advantage for the male ? possibly storing or transferring more sperm.

The researchers collected 50 virgin orb-web spiders ? 25 each, male and female ? from Singapore and raised them in the lab until they reached sexual maturity. They were mated in pairs by placing the smaller males into the female's web. The researchers recorded how long they mated, who stopped the mating, and how much palp broke off. Eighty eight percent of the time the spiders left the whole palp in the female.

After mating they left the palp in the female for different amounts of time (up to 20 minutes), then measured how much sperm was left in the palp and in the female's sexual organs. The researchers found that the detached genitalia continued to transfer sperm after sex ended.

"About 30 percent of sperm were transferred to the females before the palp breakoff, and about 70 percent of sperm were still left in the broken palp," Li said. "In our experiments, it took about 20 minutes to transfer about 85 percent of [the] sperm."

Prolonging sperm transfer
This means that after the female frightens the male away, or eats him, his genitalia remain in place and can continue sending sperm her way, even long after sex is over ? in the lab it took the females about seven hours to get the palp out. This elongated sperm transfer doesn't happen if they just break off the tip of the palp.

"This mate-plugging can partially serve as a plug to prevent other males" from mating with the female, Li said. "In addition, the eunuch males [if they survive] become more aggressive and guard the female so that this can make sure the sperm left in the severed palp can be transferred to the female after breakage," probably leading to better success at becoming a father, even in the afterlife.

Spiders aren't the only species to Lorena Bobbit their own genitals, and Li thinks the same sperm-transfer bonus may apply in other species, as well: "This may apply to other spider species and other animals in which males castrate their genitals, for example, in fire ants, ground beetles, scorpions and cephalopods," he said.

The study will be published Feb. 1 in the journal Biology Letters.

You can follow LiveScience staff writer Jennifer Welsh on Twitter @microbelover. Follow LiveScience for the latest in science news and discoveries on Twitter@livescienceand onFacebook.

? 2012 LiveScience.com. All rights reserved.

Source: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/46212301/ns/technology_and_science-science/

vs fashion show 2011 victoria secret fashion show beverly hills hotel beverly hills hotel tori spelling brian williams patrice o neal

Panetta: US combat in Afghanistan to end next year

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta arrives in Brussels, Belgium, Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2012, to attend a NATO conference . (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta arrives in Brussels, Belgium, Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2012, to attend a NATO conference . (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta answers questions from the media on board the his plane en route to a NATO conference in Brussels, Belgium, Wednesday, Feb. 1, 2012. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)

Defense Secretary Leon Panetta boards a plane at Andrews Air Force Base, Md., Wednesday, Feb. 1,2012, bound for a NATO conference in Brussels, Belgium. (AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, Pool)

(AP) ? Defense Secretary Leon Panetta laid out the administration's most explicit portrayal of the U.S. drawdown in Afghanistan, saying Wednesday that U.S. and other international forces in Afghanistan expect to end their combat role in 2013 and continue a training and advisory role with Afghan forces through 2014.

Panetta's remarks to reporters traveling with him to a NATO defense ministers meeting in Brussels showed how the foreign military role in Afghanistan is expected to evolve from the current high-intensity fight against the Taliban to a support role with Afghans fully in the lead. The timeline fits neatly into the U.S. political calendar, enabling President Barack Obama to declare on the campaign trail this year that in addition to bringing all U.S. troops home from Iraq and beginning a troop drawdown in Afghanistan, he also has a target period for ending the U.S. combat role there.

It also serves to possibly bridge an apparent gap between France and the rest of the NATO partners of the U.S. on defining the end game in Afghanistan.

All NATO members in November 2010 endorsed a plan to keep forces in Afghanistan until the end of 2014. But France this week appeared to throw that plan into doubt when President Nicolas Sarkozy proposed, with Afghan President Hamid Karzai at his side and seemingly in agreement, that NATO end its mission in 2013 ? one year earlier than planned.

Sarkozy also said, however, that France would provide support for the training of Afghan forces beyond 2013, so his approach might not be entirely different from the one Panetta outlined in which allied troops shed their combat role in the second half of 2013 but remain through 2014 to train, advise and assist.

Panetta said he hoped to hear more from the French delegation at the NATO talks Thursday and Friday.

Panetta called 2013 a critical year for the Afghanistan mission that has dragged on for more than a decade with little sign that the Taliban will be decisively defeated. He noted that NATO and the Afghan government intend to begin a final phase of handing off sections of the country to Afghan security control in mid-2013.

"Hopefully by the mid to latter part of 2013 we'll be able to make a transition from a combat role to a training, advise and assist role," he said. He added that this "doesn't mean we're not going to be combat-ready," but rather that the U.S. and other international forces will no longer be in "the formal combat role we're in now."

Panetta said the administration wants to make sure that the Afghan forces, after foreign troops depart, are "sufficient and sustainable," but noted that will require continuing financial support not only from the United States but also from allies and many other countries.

"One of the things we'll be discussing (in Brussels) is what the size of that (Afghan) force should be, but a lot of that will be dependent on the funds that are going to be put on the table in order to sustain that force," he said. "That's one of the things, frankly, I'm going to be pushing at this (meeting)."

? A senior defense official traveling with Panetta said the U.S. believes Afghanistan will not need as big a force as is now being built. NATO has set a target of 352,000 Afghan soldiers and police. The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity under ground rules set by the Pentagon, said the U.S. thinks a smaller force would be adequate, but he would not be more specific

He likened this approach to the way Obama managed the final two years of U.S. military involvement in Iraq. Obama declared an end to the U.S. combat role there on Aug. 31, 2010 but kept tens of thousands of troops there through the end of last year to continue training and advising Iraqi security forces.

Panetta said no decisions have been made about how many U.S. troops would be required to remain there once the combat role has ended. He suggested, however, that large reductions, below the 68,000 troop level projected for this September, were unlikely in the months immediately after the shift. The U.S. now has about 91,000 troops there as part of the International Security Assistance Force. The fact that much military work will remain after 2013 "demands that we have a strong presence there," he said.

Although Panetta made no mention of it, U.S. Marines in Afghanistan already are making that transition out of a combat role. They are operating in Helmand province in southwestern Afghanistan, where the Taliban have been greatly weakened, and are on track to reduce their numbers significantly this year. Panetta's remarks indicated that this switch into a support role will be applied across Afghanistan, assuming no major setbacks against the Taliban and continued progress in training Afghan forces.

Many U.S. forces already are training and advising Afghan forces.

Marine Gen. John Allen, the overall commander of international forces in Afghanistan, has been talking publicly since last fall about converting the military role from combat to what he has called "security assistance." But Panetta went further in identifying mid- to late-2013 as the target for completing this conversion countrywide.

Panetta was in Brussels to attend a NATO meeting at which this and other issues related to the war in Afghanistan are expected to top the agenda. The session is intended to help pave the way for key decisions to be announced at a summit meeting of NATO heads of government in Chicago in May.

In Washington, a senior European diplomat said Sarkozy's initial comments caused confusion among other NATO allies. The diplomat, speaking on condition of anonymity to relate internal discussions, said the French president was referring to the shift from combat operations to a training mission in 2013, although he acknowledged that Sarkozy appeared to be calling for all operations to end next year. The diplomat said NATO plans to leave the 2014 deadline in place.

On his second trip to Europe since becoming Pentagon chief last July 1, Panetta is gathering with his counterparts at a delicate time for NATO, not only because of the uncertainty surrounding the military mission in Afghanistan but also because of a growing gap in military power between the U.S. and nearly all other European members of the alliance.

That chasm is not expected to narrow even as the U.S. reduces its defense budget by nearly $490 billion over the coming decade and reduces the size of the Army and Marine Corps.

The U.S. remains the leader of a 28-nation NATO, but the Obama administration has made no secret of its intention to shift focus toward Asia and the Middle East. It announced last week that it will remove two Army brigades from Europe in the next two years, leaving one in Germany and one in Italy. The alliance also is quietly discussing the possible withdrawal of American nuclear weapons from Europe in coming years. The nuclear issue is on the agenda for the Brussels meeting.

Gen. Ray Odierno, the Army chief of staff, said last week that the two brigades being removed from Europe will be eliminated rather than reassigned to U.S. bases. Both are based in Germany ? the 172nd Infantry Brigade, in Grafenwoehr, and the 170th Infantry Brigade, in Baumholder. Odierno said that in the long run this change will benefit both the United States and its European partners because U.S. Army combat and support units will periodically rotate in and out of Europe for training and joint exercises that are designed to meet the needs of the European forces.

___

Robert Burns can be followed on Twitter at http://twitter.com/robertburnsAP

Associated Press writer Anne Gearan contributed to this report.

?

Associated Press

Source: http://hosted2.ap.org/APDEFAULT/3d281c11a96b4ad082fe88aa0db04305/Article_2012-02-01-EU-Panetta-Afghanistan/id-5036c35595a64a1395c8248f357ea62c

indoor football league newt gingrich wife callista rick perry travis barker get back on board marianne gingrich

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Iran keeping option open on nuclear weapon: U.S. spy chief (Reuters)

WASHINGTON (Reuters) ? Iran is keeping the option open to develop a nuclear weapon but U.S. intelligence agencies do not know whether it will eventually decided to build one, the U.S. intelligence chief said on Tuesday.

New U.S. sanctions imposed over Iran's nuclear program were likely to have a greater impact than previous ones, but were not expected to lead to the downfall of Tehran's leadership, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper said in prepared testimony on the annual worldwide threat assessment for the Senate intelligence committee.

"We assess Iran is keeping open the option to develop nuclear weapons, in part by developing various nuclear capabilities that better position it to produce such weapons, should it choose to do so," Clapper said. "We do not know, however, if Iran will eventually decide to build nuclear weapons."

Iran is expanding its uranium enrichment capabilities, which can be used for either civil or weapons purposes, he said.

"Iran's technical advancement, particularly in uranium enrichment, strengthens our assessment that Iran has the scientific, technical, and industrial capacity to eventually produce nuclear weapons, making the central issue its political will to do so," Clapper said.

"These advancements contribute to our judgment that Iran is technically capable of producing enough highly enriched uranium for a weapon, if it so chooses," he said.

President Barack Obama signed into law December 31 sanctions on Iran's central bank. The new U.S. sanctions will have a greater impact on Iran because the Central Bank of Iran handles a large volume of foreign bank transactions and receives the revenue for the roughly 70 percent of Iranian oil sold by the National Iranian Oil Company, Clapper said.

"Despite this, Iran's economic difficulties probably will not jeopardize the regime, absent a sudden and sustained fall in oil prices or a sudden domestic crisis that disrupts oil exports," he said.

Iran has sought to "exploit the Arab Spring but has reaped limited benefits, thus far," the testimony said. Its biggest regional concern is Syria where a change in leadership would be a major strategic loss for Tehran.

Nearly a year into the unrest, the situation in Syria is unlikely to be resolved quickly, Clapper said.

"Both the regime and the opposition are determined to prevail, and neither side appears willing to compromise on the key issue of President Bashar al-Assad remaining in power."

CHINA CONCERNED

The Arab Spring uprisings fueled concern among Chinese leaders that similar unrest could undermine their rule, prompting Beijing to launch its harshest crackdown on dissent in at least a decade, Clapper said.

At the same time, worries about the global economy helped heighten Beijing's resistance to external pressure and suspicion of U.S. intentions, he said.

China continued a policy of permitting modest appreciation of the renminbi, "although it remains substantially undervalued," the testimony said.

In North Korea, it is still early to assess the extent of the new leader, Kim Jong-un's authority, Clapper said. Senior North Korean leaders will probably remain cohesive at least in the near term to prevent instability and protect their interests, the testimony said.

U.S. intelligence agencies judge that North Korea tested two nuclear devices, in October 2006 and May 2009, which "strengthen our assessment that North Korea has produced nuclear weapons," Clapper said.

"The Intelligence Community assesses Pyongyang views its nuclear capabilities as intended for deterrence, international prestige, and coercive diplomacy. We judge that North Korea would consider using nuclear weapons only under narrow circumstances," he said.

SPYING THREAT

Espionage by China, Russia, and Iran will remain top threats to the United States in coming years, Clapper said. Russia and China are aggressive and successful in economic espionage against the United States, and "Iran's intelligence operations against the United States, including cyber capabilities, have dramatically increased in recent years in depth and complexity."

Foreign intelligence services have targeted the unclassified and classified computer networks of U.S. government agencies, businesses, and universities. "We assess that many intrusions into U.S. networks are not being detected," he said.

The next two to three years will be a "critical transition phase" for the terrorism threat facing the United States, particularly from al Qaeda and like-minded groups, Clapper said.

Al Qaeda's leadership is expected to become more decentralized, with the core group formerly led by Osama bin Laden diminishing in operational importance. Counterterrorism efforts to keep pressure on the group could lead to fragmentation of the movement within a few years, he said.

Core al Qaeda is in decline and with the death of Osama bin Laden, "the global jihadist movement lost its most iconic and inspirational leader," Clapper said. Most members find al Qaeda's new leader, Ayman al-Zawahri, less compelling and "will not offer him the deference they gave bin Laden."

Source: http://us.rd.yahoo.com/dailynews/rss/iran/*http%3A//news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20120131/wl_nm/us_usa_intelligence_threats

hyundai equus nissan leaf entourage entourage empire state of mind lyrics rex grossman arizona cardinals

Does PETA Have a Legitimate Beef with The Grey?

Joe Carnahan probably knew he was in for something of a tussle when his latest film, the survival actioner/mortality meditation The Grey, began drawing criticism from animal activist groups sight unseen even before it debuted (at #1, no less) last weekend. But then PETA posted its own twofold complaint regarding the depiction of wolves in the film and the reported eating of wolf meat on Carnahan?s set, escalating the anti-Grey fight. The question is, does PETA have a legit beef with The Grey?

In a blog entry posted to the official PETA website, the organization blasts Carnahan on two fronts for being ?rotten to wolves from the get-go.? First, the more general grievance: The Grey, they say, makes wolves look bad.

?The writers paint a pack of wolves living in the Alaskan wilderness as bloodthirsty monsters, intent on killing every survivor of a plane crash by tearing each person limb from limb,? claims PETA, when in actuality wolves ?shy away from? humans.

Carnahan?s film (scripted by Ian MacKenzie Jeffers from his own short story) takes fairly diligent measures to portray its wolves as agents of nature, dangerous to be sure but with their own reasons for attacking Liam Neeson?s Ottway and his fellow oil rig workers. They?re glimpsed in the dark all glowing eyes and howling breaths and are seen tearing unfortunate victims to bloody pieces, but are they ?monsters,? or simply animals acting on their natural impulses to defend their territory from encroaching human invaders?

Speaking earlier this month in Los Angeles, Carnahan explained his take on the wolves of The Grey. ?I think the wolves are a facet of and thereby a force of nature, but they?re no different in my mind than the river, than the blizzard, than the cliffside,? he said. ?They are component parts of a whole, which is nature. And for all of its beauty there?s equal parts hostility.?

To this end, every front facing the men of The Grey has the potential for death ? the blizzard conditions that fell their airplane, the freezing cold, the river, the harsh terrain. A polar bear, cut from the film, was to have posed a similar threat. Its inclusion may have slightly lessened the weight of the wolves as the film?s only animal foes, but the theme remains the same: It?s not that these things are evil, but that man ? stripped of his weapons and the trappings of civilization -- can only infringe so far on the dominion of nature and its creatures. Watch The Grey and you come away with a deep respect for these animals and their somewhat anthropomorphized qualities ? their intricate pack relations, capacity for loss, and sense for what one character intimates as revenge. Man?s folly is in thinking himself above mortality.

Besides: If Carnahan wanted to vilify wolves as his film's antagonists, a la sharks in Jaws, that would be a matter of creative license. Do you see the Syfy Channel attacked for propagating irresponsible messages about Mega Snakes and Sharktopi?

Verdict on this count: Carnahan 1, PETA 0.

PETA?s other contention is a bit trickier. According to reports, Carnahan flew in a batch of frozen wolf meat for his cast to munch, Method-style, in preparation for a scene in the film. ?[Carnahan] bought the meat from a trapper, meaning that the wolves likely suffered horribly in traps before being killed,? wrote PETA, calling this move a reneging on a promise by the filmmakers to ?use only computer-generated imagery and animatronic wolves.? [UPDATE: The Province spoke to trapper Dick McDiarmid for his account of providing wolf carcasses to the production.]

Taking to Twitter, Carnahan shot back. ?To suggest otherwise is cheap and uninformed,? he wrote in just one of a series of Tweets on the matter. ?Not a single animal was harmed for the making of this film.? [UPDATE: Carnahan Tweeted directly to Movieline to clarify in plain terms: "...There was no trapping or hunting. We didn't harm a single wolf in the making of this film."]

And this: ?Guys, I donate $100 a month to the Humane Society to prevent canned hunting of all kinds. Protestors. Look up my records & SHUT THE FUCK UP.?

Colorful language aside, Carnahan insists that no animals were harmed in the making of the film, but does he escape culpability if said animals were trapped and killed prior to filming by third parties, then utilized in the service of the film? Even if Carnahan didn?t buy the wolf meat to order ? if it was in ?some guy??s basement freezer for six months before the cast of The Grey chowed down, having ostensibly been killed for practical reasons ? is Carnahan culpable for supporting the kill after the fact?

Here's a note from the American Humane Association (via Box Office Magazine), which did send a certified representative to observe filming but conspicuously did not lend its ?No Animals Were Harmed? seal of approval to the credits roll, explaining the omission:

?American Humane Association monitored the live animal action during the filming of The Grey. Our Certified Animal Safety RepresentativeTM on the set of the movie ensured the humane treatment of all of the animals used in this film. The movie does not however carry the American Humane Association "No Animals Were Harmed"? end-credit certification. Our process in awarding the end-credit includes a screening of the locked motion picture, which we were not given. Productions must be screened to determine cohesiveness with all of our on-set documentation.?

As for the wolf meat accusations, AHA had this to add: ?Online allegations regarding the consumption of wolf meat by cast members of The Grey, have not been verified and sources within the production and distribution entities have not returned our phone calls of inquiry. American Humane Association does not permit the trapping and/or killing of any animals for use in filmed entertainment.?

Most AHA animal monitoring concerns the use of living animals in productions, but they do have guidelines regarding the use of dead animals, essentially requiring proper documentation and receipts for transactions that proves the animals were "destroyed in the normal course of the source?s operations and were not killed for the production."

So Movieliners, let?s hash this one out. Does PETA have legit ground to stand on with either or both of their complaints against The Grey, or was Carnahan right when he Tweeted the following to his critics: ?Wolfaboo wackos. Your insane rants about us killing wolves only makes the movie more of a curiosity and thus, more successful. Keep it up!??

Follow Jen Yamato on Twitter.
Follow Movieline on Twitter.

Source: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/1924416/news/1924416/

braves harrys law orioles atlanta braves national coffee day national coffee day paw paw

iVillage Woman of the Week!

Each week iVillage celebrates a woman who makes us proud. See who we're highlighting this week.

Source: http://www.ivillage.com/woman-week-1/1-b-211957?dst=iv%3AiVillage%3Awoman-week-1-211957

mildred pierce cam newton emmy awards nick collins cape coral fl emmys emmys

Warming in the Tasman Sea a global warming hot spot

Monday, January 30, 2012

Oceanographers have identified a series of ocean hotspots around the world generated by strengthening wind systems that have driven oceanic currents, including the East Australian Current, polewards beyond their known boundaries.

The hotspots have formed alongside ocean currents that wash the east coast of the major continents and their warming proceeds at a rate far exceeding the average rate of ocean surface warming, according to an international science team whose work is published in the journal Nature Climate Change today.

Paper co-author, CSIRO's Dr Wenju Cai, said that while the finding has local ecological implications in the region surrounding the hotspots, the major influence is upon the ocean's ability to take up heat and carbon from the atmosphere.

In Australia's case, scientists report intensifying east-west winds at high latitudes (45?-55?S) pushing southward and speeding up the gyre or swirl of currents circulating in the South Pacific, extending from South America to the Australian coast. The resulting changes in ocean circulation patterns have pushed the East Australian Current around 350 kilometres further south, with temperatures east of Tasmania as much as two degrees warmer than they were 60 years ago. "We would expect natural change in the oceans over decades or centuries but change with such elevated sea surface temperatures in a growing number of locations and in a synchronised manner was definitely not expected," said CSIRO's Dr Wenju Cai.

"Detecting these changes has been hindered by limited observations but with a combination of multi-national ocean watch systems and computer simulations we have been able to reconstruct an ocean history in which warming over the past century is 2-3 times faster than the global average ocean warming rate," says Dr Cai, a climate scientist at CSIRO's Wealth from Oceans Research Flagship.

The changes are characterised by a combination of currents pushing nearer to the polar regions and intensify with systematic changes of wind over both hemispheres, attributed to increasing greenhouse gases.

Dr Cai said the increase of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere has been the major driver of the surface warming of the Earth over the 20th century. This is projected to continue.

He said the research points to the need for a long-term monitoring network of the western boundary currents. In March next year, Australian scientists plan to deploy a series of moored ocean sensors across the East Australian Current to observe change season-to-season and year-to-year.

###

CSIRO Australia: http://www.csiro.au

Thanks to CSIRO Australia for this article.

This press release was posted to serve as a topic for discussion. Please comment below. We try our best to only post press releases that are associated with peer reviewed scientific literature. Critical discussions of the research are appreciated. If you need help finding a link to the original article, please contact us on twitter or via e-mail.

This press release has been viewed 36 time(s).

Source: http://www.labspaces.net/117175/Warming_in_the_Tasman_Sea_a_global_warming_hot_spot

kellen winslow ben folds sprint iphone sprint iphone defamation solyndra tesla model s